An Open Letter to the Fresno Bee Editorial Board and Staff Reporters,
Well, based upon the tepid response to the Bee’s Sunday Editorial on Feinstein and the proposed $9.3 Billion Water Bond, it seems that there is not that much enthusiasm or appetite for building a multi-billion dollar storage facility at Temperance Flat on the upper San Joaquin River. There certainly does not seem to be a taxpayer-led groundswell. I believe it is time to go to the next level of having an honest public debate about the cost-benefits of building a multi-billion dollar surface storage facility at Temperance Flat - versus other potential solutions such as the San Joaquin Valley Water Leadership Forum’s bi-partisan San Joaquin Valley centered Millerton Enlargement and Tulare Lake surface/groundwater storage concept proposal that was presented to the Fresno Bee Editorial Board and Staff Reporters on July 7th.
Respectfully, I must point out that one major editorial housekeeping item that the Fresno Bee keeps neglecting is: “Where do the taxpayers of the San Joaquin Valley and California stand on the issue?”. I know that great attention is given as it relates to the Enviros from outside the valley - and there is much vitriol that seems to be focused on them as anti-progress, anti-Ag, anti-Valley way of life; and into “rural cleansing” (compliments of course from Nunes and Radanovich). I must ask, have the Howard Jarvis people being interviewed by the Bee - and are they highly visible while leading the charge to build a dam at Temperance Flat? Which local and respected economist or prominent fiscal conservative here in the valley has been interviewed? Where do our own Valley Taxpayer Representatives such as Jeff Reid stand on the issue? To me this is the “real acid test” that the Bee should be including in the debate - and that our own fiscal conservatives should be providing.
I believe because of the current cost estimates of nearly $5 Billion for constructing a dam at Temperance Flat, future debates should be focused on that question posed earlier, “What do the taxpayers of the San Joaquin Valley and California think?”. If they (meaning the proponents of Temperance Flat dam) are lucky enough to get their bond measure on the ballot - which now appears to be at the earliest June, 2009 - then they will continue to remain out of synch with getting the people of California behind their multi-billion dollar super-bond. Why? Because it will line up with the next budget cycle impasse - and again held as a bargaining tool. I am suggesting they will have nowhere to go with their proposal just on the fact that it does not - and will not ever pencil out economically.
To remain in a protracted stalemate year after year - just like the highly predictable annual budget impasses in Sacramento - and pitting Enviros against farmers is a false and futile premise - and can only be defined as political insanity.
Even though that may be the case - the San Joaquin Valley Water Leadership Forum will continue to pursue on an assertive and highly visible campaign towards the enlargement of Millerton Lake and the restoration of a portion of the Tulare Lake basin for significant surface and groundwater storage for our valley’s needs.
Here’s another example of fiscal and political insanity that is playing out in the inhospitable deserts of Southern California. Point in case is the fact that the Feds and State are willing to pour $8.9 billion dollars into the Salton Sea environmental fiasco - and fiscal morass as “environmental restoration”. It should be emphatically pointed out that as long as they attempt to use this man-made error of a hundred years ago of a highly saline and toxic body of water for environmental purposes - no matter how much money, time and other resources are thrown at it -nothing on a sustainable basis will ever come out of it that will ever benefit Ag, urban and rural communities; the environment and all of the people of California as taxpayers.
Whereas, historically the Tulare Lake Basin was the largest freshwater body -and probably the largest migratory flyway in the state of California outside of the pre-1849 San Francisco Bay Estuary and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. At least with the Tulare Basin there is substantial potential with the use of fresh high quality Sierra Nevada water coming down from the San Joaquin, Kings, Kaweah, Tule and possibly Kern River flowing down into a partially restored Tulare Lake. Just 10% of the former lake would be twice the amount of storage versus Temperance Flat. Partiaisl restoration of Tulare Lake as a surface and groundwater storage facility substantially superior in comparison with the Salton Sea being used as the largest cesspool not only in California - but, the United States as a whole.
Take just $1 Billion that they are grudgingly yet willing to spend for the Salton Sea - and transfer those monies to the Tulare Lake Basin where a far better environmental restoration can be performed - and at the same time be able to use the water for agricultural, Municipal/Industrial (known as M&I) purposes - while providing significant and meaningful environmental mitigation on a statewide basis. The Salton Sea doesn’t - and never will come close no matter how much tax payer money, time and commitment is made by the state of California.
To us there are at least 16 primary and superior arguments in support of Millerton Lake enlargement coupled with Tulare Lake restoration versus a dam at Temperance flat on the San Joaquin River - or pouring money into the Salton Sea:
- Millerton Lake enlargement will provide additional flood control and storage benefit at a fraction of the cost - and with a much less significant impact to the environment
- Unlike Temperance Flat - Millerton Lake will NOT affect the two major PG&E hydroelectric facilities that produce clean energy to a growing valley - and without adding any additional CO2 contributing towards climate change
- Millerton enlargement and Tulare Lake storage with other infrastructure improvements will be truly inexpensive to the taxpayers of California - with plenty of “bang for the buck” for taxpayers - AND, potentially at no cost to the taxpayers whatsoever by “transferring” Salton Sea funds over to the Tulare Lake restoration project
- Tulare Lake storage facility can be connected to the Friant-Kern Canal and the California Aqueduct which will allow for a much more effective and efficient way in which to move water around in the San Joaquin Valley
- The water can be used for agriculture, M&I for rural and urban communities - and for recreational and environmental benefits
- Relatively little additional energy would be required to operate Tulare Lake - this versus the significant loss of clean hydroelectricity if Temperance dam is built
- Tulare Lake is an off channel storage facility (similar to the Sites proposal off of the Sacramento River) - so there is very little if any impact to a river
- Tulare Lake will provide twice as much surface storage as Temperance Flat - at 1/5 of the cost
- Tulare Lake restoration provides for groundwater storage “for a rainy day”
- The flood waters of five (5) rivers - San Joaquin, Kings, Kaweah, Tule and potentially the Kern can be captures and used for beneficial uses - versus only one if a dam is built at Temperance on the San Joaquin River
- True environmental and economic justice (EJ2) can be addressed for our rural farming communities in the San Joaquin Valley
- Taxpayers and true fiscal conservatives would be more than willing to pay for it based on clearly demonstrated cost-benefits and return on investment (ROI)
- The proposal provides the most flexibility for water conveyance and management of supply versus demand in the San Joaquin Valley on a cost effective basis - and allows for leveraging off of existing infrastructure
- It will significantly contribute to the restoration of the San Joaquin River with the ability to replace by recirculation or exchange water sent down from Friant to the confluence of the Merced river for the cold water fisheries
- Environmental restoration of the Tulare Lake basin provides for significant and truly meaningful mitigation of environmental impacts on a statewide basis
- San Joaquin Valley interests can manage the water that comes from the Sierra Nevada in their best interests and needs on a sustainable basis - rather than based upon outside interests and the state of California as a whole
Thus we propose a friendly challenge to the Fresno Bee - Let’s lay out these two competing proposals side by side in the newspaper so that all constiuents in the San Joaquin Valley - and the rest of California have an opportunity to make an informed decision. Just as the Bee took the greatly appreciated initiative to conduct discussions on air quality “The Last Gasp” - the SJVWLF is proposing that one of the Editors and a staff reporter create a forum such as “Down to the last Drop”.
Please bear in mind that the political calculus for water is much greater than the San Joaquin Valley - and what may believe collectively be in our best interests. We need to develop meaningful relationships within our communities that will allow all constituencies to be able to sit at the table . A successful model that we could emumlate was the second go around with Measure C and the 1/2 cent sales tax re-authorization. Possibly Fresno County COG and the other county COGs could faciliatate that same kind of forum to address water resource here in the San Joaquin Valley?? And then maybe we can address the pressing issue of water in our Valley as One Voice.
We look forward with great anticipation to your response.
Sincerely,
Steve Haze
Program Director
